Fecha de la publicación: 07/12/2016
Autor: Alejandra Bravo-Molina (1), José Patricio Linares-Palomino (2), Blanca Vera-Arroyo (3), Luis Miguel Salmerón-Febres (2), Eduardo Ros-Díe (2)
1Unidad de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain. Electronic address: email@example.com.
2Unidad de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada, Granada, Spain.
3Unidad de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Background: The aim of this cohort study was to assess the inter-observer agreement of three diabetic foot classification systems: the Wagner, the University of Texas and the PEDIS.
Methods: We included 250 consecutive patients diagnosed of diabetic foot syndrome in 2009-2013. Wound scores were recorded at admission and a reevaluation was performed simultaneously or 24h later by a different evaluator. Demographical, laboratory data and associated risk factors were obtained from the patients’ medical records.
Results: The Kappa coefficient showed a moderate inter-observer agreement between the first evaluation and the reevaluation for Wagner scale (Kappa=0.55; 95% CI: 0.507-0.593), University of Texas scale (Kappa=0.513; 95% CI: 0.463-0.563) and for PEDIS scale (Kappa=0.574; 95% CI: 0.522-0.626).
Conclusions: This moderate agreement shows that these scales should not be used alone for management decisions regarding diabetic foot syndrome and should, therefore, be integrated with other clinical data to ensure an adequate handover.
Copyright © 2016 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.